12 angry men movie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

12 furious men film - Essay Example The film for named for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay dependent on material from another medium) and finds a spot in the rundown ever extraordinary motion pictures. In 2007, the library of Congress picked â€Å"12 furious men† for safeguarding in the United States National Film Registry. Here, we break down the elements of the 12 legal hearers and what may have impacted them in taking a ruling for or against the denounced. The film starts with the scene in which the appointed authority is seen offering guidelines to a jury comprising of 12 noble men. The appointed authority educates the jury that the respondent should take the hot seat whenever demonstrated blameworthy. The jury is likewise trained that their judgment ought to be consistent. The jury at that point moves into the jury room where they get to know different individuals from the jury and start their work. The case which opens up as a straightforward situation takes a turn when one of members of the jury (hearer #8) chooses to veto the choice of the other eleven legal hearers. He can persuade different legal hearers that the respondent ought to be vindicated as there is question past sensible cutoff scrutinizing the realness of the observers. In any case, different hearers don't follow the member of the jury #8 rapidly. The legal hearer #8 faces solid contention from different individuals which sets up the film. The jury chose to cast a bal lot 12-0 for absolution and shutting scene shows the twelve members of the jury leaving the jury space to introduce their discoveries of actuality to the court. Member of the jury #8(Henry Fonda) is the most significant character of the plot as he is the first to veto the choice and question the validness of the observers. In spite of the fact that the legal hearer #8 seems both sure and apprehensive toward the start, as the conversation continues he prevails with regards to causing different members of the jury to have confidence in his contention that there is question past sensible cutoff in announcing the kid as blameworthy of homicide. Member of the jury #9 quickly bolsters the perspective on legal hearer #8. Legal hearer #5 and #2 additionally follow